Search found 9 matches
- Fri Oct 20, 2017 12:12 pm
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Error in nested loops
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6683
Re: Error in nested loops
I tried to replicate the error with the following macros: code1.txt: SAY "inside code1" LOOP b1000 1 10000 OBEY "code2.txt" ENDLOOP code2.txt: SAY "inside code2" OBEY "code3.txt" OBEY "code4.txt" code3.txt: SAY "inside code3" code4.txt: SA...
- Thu Oct 19, 2017 11:08 pm
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Error in nested loops
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6683
Re: Error in nested loops
The shouldn't be a limitation on the number of calls to obey that you can make within a macro. If you could provide a simplified example that demonstrates the problem then I will investigate this further. Say, I have the main code as 'code1'. Inside that there is an obey command to call 'code2'. In...
- Thu Oct 19, 2017 3:52 pm
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Error in nested loops
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6683
Error in nested loops
Hi, I get the following error when I run a macro. I do not have 2 loops in that macro. But I have 2 'obey' functions. Is it why I do get this error? I am very grateful if someone can help. This only occurs after few loops in the main macro worked well. error while obeying batch file D:\****\***\Code...
- Tue Oct 10, 2017 8:39 am
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Multilevel data with 2 binary responses
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3891
Re: Multilevel data with 2 binary responses
We provide some additional datasets at http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/learning/support/datasets/ , so you may find something suitable there. Alternatively you could make binary responses from continuous variable as described in section 14.5 of the MLwiN user guide (see http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/me...
- Sun Oct 08, 2017 1:10 pm
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Multilevel data with 2 binary responses
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3891
Multilevel data with 2 binary responses
Hi all,
Where can I find a data set of multilevel data with 2 correlated binary responses and at least one continuous explanatory variable? I was not able to find such a data set even in the inbuilt data sets available in MLwiN.
Thanks in advance...
Where can I find a data set of multilevel data with 2 correlated binary responses and at least one continuous explanatory variable? I was not able to find such a data set even in the inbuilt data sets available in MLwiN.
Thanks in advance...
- Fri Sep 01, 2017 2:20 am
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Goodness of fit test for Multilevel logistic models
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4248
Re: Goodness of fit test for Multilevel logistic models
Hi ddswick, To confirm the Hosmer-Lemeshew test has not been implemented in MLwiN. In the multilevel setting there are residuals available and the diagnostics that go with testing these are available as in normal models. Hope that answers your question. Best wishes, Bill. Thank you very much
- Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:08 am
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Goodness of fit test for Multilevel logistic models
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4248
Goodness of fit test for Multilevel logistic models
Hi,
Are there any goodness of fit tests available for multilevel logistic models in MLwiN? Is it possible to do Hosmer-Lemeshew test in MLwiN?
Thank you
Are there any goodness of fit tests available for multilevel logistic models in MLwiN? Is it possible to do Hosmer-Lemeshew test in MLwiN?
Thank you
- Sat Aug 12, 2017 3:17 pm
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Error when fitting 2 level bivariate model
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3863
Re: Error when fitting 2 level bivariate model
Thank you very much for your helpful answer... I really appreciate it...
- Thu Aug 10, 2017 3:40 pm
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Error when fitting 2 level bivariate model
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3863
Error when fitting 2 level bivariate model
When I fit a 2 level bivariate model with both variables binary I get the following error sometimes. "Error while obeying bath file: .... line number 51: calc F~(H) = expo(H)*(1+expo(H))^(-2) 140 numeric errors in calculate command, first 20 affected entries listed. Affected entries replaced wi...