Search found 18 matches

by SabineKatzdobler
Thu Oct 15, 2020 7:00 am
Forum: MLwiN user forum
Topic: Pratical help - open worksheet
Replies: 2
Views: 1392

Re: Pratical help - open worksheet

Solved! I am really grateful that you answered very quickly. That was enormous help.
The reason for the problem involved that I used dta-files so far.
by SabineKatzdobler
Wed Oct 14, 2020 6:48 pm
Forum: MLwiN user forum
Topic: Pratical help - open worksheet
Replies: 2
Views: 1392

Pratical help - open worksheet

Good day, for several weeks I have a practical problem: Everytime I open a specific worksheet in MLwiN, a great number of additional missing values are created. As a result I am forced to delete all values first, then I can start working with my data. I really would appreciate help. Is there any cha...
by SabineKatzdobler
Wed Oct 14, 2020 10:58 am
Forum: MLwiN user forum
Topic: Level Identifiers
Replies: 11
Views: 3333

Re: Level Identifiers

Good day Chris, thanks for your response. Yes, I can confirm that I added the denominator into the red nj. I used a cons (=1) vector. Regarding the level identifiers: When I specified case-id (1,2,3, etc.) and measurement occasion (e.g. 1,1,1) I get the error message in the attachment. However, when...
by SabineKatzdobler
Mon Oct 12, 2020 7:07 am
Forum: MLwiN user forum
Topic: Adding and specifying terms
Replies: 1
Views: 1244

Adding and specifying terms

Good day, apologies for asking again and again. MLwiN is full of challenges, but so far I have been very happy and grateful regarding the solutions of the support team. Generally, my goal involves testing a multilevel ordered logistic regression analysis including a within-between random effects spe...
by SabineKatzdobler
Mon Oct 12, 2020 6:22 am
Forum: MLwiN user forum
Topic: Detecting significant results
Replies: 6
Views: 2095

Re: Detecting significant results

Hi Bill,

thank you - I will analyse the results of IGLS, RIGLS and MCMC.

Kind regards,

Sabien
by SabineKatzdobler
Thu Oct 08, 2020 3:04 pm
Forum: MLwiN user forum
Topic: Detecting significant results
Replies: 6
Views: 2095

Re: Detecting significant results

Hi Bill, thanks for your quick response. For both of my questions I had the p-value for each coefficient in mind. Additionally, my variables are not normally distributed. What can you recommend for testing the effect on each coefficient on an ordered categorical response variable regarding its signi...
by SabineKatzdobler
Thu Oct 08, 2020 1:24 pm
Forum: MLwiN user forum
Topic: Detecting significant results
Replies: 6
Views: 2095

Re: Detecting significant results

Good day,

thanks for your fast response. I have a little follow-up question: Where can I see the p-value regarding the independent variables in the regression equation to determine if the independent variable is significant or not?

Kind regards,

Sabine
by SabineKatzdobler
Wed Oct 07, 2020 2:55 pm
Forum: MLwiN user forum
Topic: Detecting significant results
Replies: 6
Views: 2095

Detecting significant results

Good day, At the moment, I am trying to fit a multilevel "empty model" with an ordered category response variable and I can only see effect sizes and standard errors in the model results. My question involves, where can I see exactely if the effect sizes are statistically significant (two-...
by SabineKatzdobler
Wed Oct 07, 2020 1:23 pm
Forum: MLwiN user forum
Topic: Level Identifiers
Replies: 11
Views: 3333

Re: Level Identifiers

Hi Chris, please find below the way that produced the crash. The attached file involves the corresponding worksheet. Maybe you have an idea what exactly caused the crash and what I should do. y – Look for New Positn N-level – 1: case_id (sequence 1, 2, 3, etc.) Ordered Multinominal: Multinominal / l...
by SabineKatzdobler
Mon Oct 05, 2020 9:22 am
Forum: MLwiN user forum
Topic: Level Identifiers
Replies: 11
Views: 3333

Re: Level Identifiers

Good day Chris, yes, sure, I can confirm that I use MLwin 3.05 (64-bit version). In addition to the "crash"-problem, I would like to ask how I can specify "measurement occasion" when several persons responded at only two times of data collection and some at all three time points....