Hi Manuel,
If you type
. matrix list e(b)
You will see the vector of parameter estimates and you can then refer to them by their column names. For example...
display _b[FP1:cons]
Best wishes
George
Search found 432 matches
- Thu Mar 11, 2021 8:20 pm
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: Coefficient legends after runmlwin
- Replies: 2
- Views: 14281
- Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:27 pm
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: Is it possible to constrain the residual variance in MLwiN?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 16977
Re: Is it possible to constrain the residual variance in MLwiN?
Hi Erik,
This would be my guess at what you want to do...
Think you want to specify a three-level model. So shift the usual two-level growth-curve model up to level-2 and level-3
Observations (level-1) within observations (level-2) within persons (level-3)
Then at the new level-1 you enter the ...
This would be my guess at what you want to do...
Think you want to specify a three-level model. So shift the usual two-level growth-curve model up to level-2 and level-3
Observations (level-1) within observations (level-2) within persons (level-3)
Then at the new level-1 you enter the ...
- Thu Jan 09, 2020 7:36 pm
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: The difference of the results of "mixed" and "runmlwin"
- Replies: 1
- Views: 13948
Re: The difference of the results of "mixed" and "runmlwin"
Dear Umitotakao,
Thank you for your query. I'm afraid I don't have a good answer for you. However, at least in the example below, mixed and runmlwin provide very similar model-based standard errors to one another and equally they provide very similar cluster-robust standard errors to one another ...
Thank you for your query. I'm afraid I don't have a good answer for you. However, at least in the example below, mixed and runmlwin provide very similar model-based standard errors to one another and equally they provide very similar cluster-robust standard errors to one another ...
- Wed Jan 08, 2020 4:00 pm
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: How can I plot a caterpillar plot using odd ratios
- Replies: 4
- Views: 9407
Re: How can I plot a caterpillar plot using odd ratios
Dear nabilshaaban,
You need to first create a dataset with the predicted odds ratio of each hospital and the the associated limits of the 95% CI.
Once you have done that you need to plot the results. You can do this with the twoway command and the scatter option for the point estiamates and the ...
You need to first create a dataset with the predicted odds ratio of each hospital and the the associated limits of the 95% CI.
Once you have done that you need to plot the results. You can do this with the twoway command and the scatter option for the point estiamates and the ...
- Fri Dec 06, 2019 3:59 pm
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: Four-level CCM, variance components
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8236
Re: Four-level CCM, variance components
Dear dand1994,
"I have used: runmlwin s_roa cons, level6(home : cons) level5(firm: cons) level4(industry: cons) level3(host: cons) level2(unit: cons) level1(year: cons) mcmc(cc) initsprevious nopause, although I do not believe it to be forrect"
What you have written is correct for a cross ...
"I have used: runmlwin s_roa cons, level6(home : cons) level5(firm: cons) level4(industry: cons) level3(host: cons) level2(unit: cons) level1(year: cons) mcmc(cc) initsprevious nopause, although I do not believe it to be forrect"
What you have written is correct for a cross ...
- Fri Aug 23, 2019 4:02 pm
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: Inconsistent results from runmlwin and svy:mean
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7721
Re: Inconsistent results from runmlwin and sys:mean
Dear Sun,
Not sure, but am not that experienced in Stata's svyset commands
runmlwin should give the same results as Stata's mixed command. So suggest you first compare your svyset method to mixed (where you use the mixed weights options).
Assuming mixed and runmlwin give same results, Suggest ...
Not sure, but am not that experienced in Stata's svyset commands
runmlwin should give the same results as Stata's mixed command. So suggest you first compare your svyset method to mixed (where you use the mixed weights options).
Assuming mixed and runmlwin give same results, Suggest ...
- Thu Aug 01, 2019 3:18 pm
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Mediation
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7549
Re: Mediation
Dear Vicky,
There is no automation of multilevel mediation analysis in MLwiN. You would need to implement the models and carry out any post-estimation tests by hand.
There are no training materials on multilevel mediation analysis in MLwiN that I am aware of though you should be able to replicate ...
There is no automation of multilevel mediation analysis in MLwiN. You would need to implement the models and carry out any post-estimation tests by hand.
There are no training materials on multilevel mediation analysis in MLwiN that I am aware of though you should be able to replicate ...
- Tue Jul 23, 2019 9:33 am
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: jackknife replicate weight in runmlwin
- Replies: 3
- Views: 9253
Re: jackknife replicate weight in runmlwin
Hi Sun Lee,
Yes you can specify weights in runmlwin. You need to specify weights at each level in the model.
See the help file and search for "weight" to find the weights options.
Unfortunately we do not have an example to show you.
There is an example in the Stata ME manual for their -mixed ...
Yes you can specify weights in runmlwin. You need to specify weights at each level in the model.
See the help file and search for "weight" to find the weights options.
Unfortunately we do not have an example to show you.
There is an example in the Stata ME manual for their -mixed ...
- Mon Jul 08, 2019 12:04 pm
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: Mixed-effects, mixed distribution model
- Replies: 2
- Views: 56986
Re: Mixed-effects, mixed distribution model
Dear Gujarish,
No you cannot fit this specific model in MLwiN.
For these data, what you could do in MLwiN is fit the analyses in two parts.
First, fit a multilevel model for whether peopled walked at all (0 steps vs 1+ steps)
Then for the subset who had 1+ steps you could fit a multilevel model ...
No you cannot fit this specific model in MLwiN.
For these data, what you could do in MLwiN is fit the analyses in two parts.
First, fit a multilevel model for whether peopled walked at all (0 steps vs 1+ steps)
Then for the subset who had 1+ steps you could fit a multilevel model ...
- Mon Jun 10, 2019 9:09 am
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: autocorrelation problem in within-between random effect model
- Replies: 10
- Views: 26481
Re: autocorrelation problem in within-between random effect model
Dear umitotakao,
You can specify cluster robust standard errors in runmlwin
See the fpsandwich option
Note. If you wish to exclude the random effect from the model then you will need to constrain this parameter to zero, otherwise MLwiN won't know what the clusters are.
Best wishes
George
You can specify cluster robust standard errors in runmlwin
See the fpsandwich option
Note. If you wish to exclude the random effect from the model then you will need to constrain this parameter to zero, otherwise MLwiN won't know what the clusters are.
Best wishes
George