You could try a Wald test, an example of which is given in the MLwiN manual replication examples for runmlwin:
Chapter 9: Logistic Models for Binary and Binomial Responses
A more detailed explanation for these examples can be found in the corresponding chapter of the MLwiN User Guide
Search found 1359 matches
- Tue Jul 09, 2024 10:22 am
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: lr-test
- Replies: 1
- Views: 44121
- Tue Jul 09, 2024 10:13 am
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: Issues Running runMLwiN on macOS with Virtual Machine
- Replies: 2
- Views: 46498
Re: Issues Running runMLwiN on macOS with Virtual Machine
Unfortunately I have not had much success with running the MLwiN trial under Wine on MacOS versions later than 10.14, as later versions removed support for 32-bit applications and then moved from the Intel to ARM platform. This might change in the future as Wine is developed and experimental support ...
- Thu Jun 27, 2024 3:31 pm
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: Error "Unable to invert xtx."
- Replies: 4
- Views: 58738
Re: Error "Unable to invert xtx."
It's hard to say what exactly is causing this error without seeing the data. It could be something like there being colinear variables in the model, or you might have categorical variables where no data is present for a particular category value.
In order to work out what might be going on I would ...
In order to work out what might be going on I would ...
- Tue May 21, 2024 9:37 am
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Finding multilevel model level three residuals
- Replies: 2
- Views: 47174
Re: Finding multilevel model level three residuals
If you're using MLwiN then you can request residuals at any level using the "Residuals" window (see chapter 3 of the MLwiN user guide: https://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/media/software/mlwin/downloads/manuals/3-07/manual-web.pdf ), or by using RLEV command in combination with the RESI command.
- Fri May 17, 2024 3:45 pm
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Incompatibility of MLwiN Macros after upgrade
- Replies: 1
- Views: 44377
Re: Incompatibility of MLwiN Macros after upgrade
On the whole macros written in older versions are supposed to continue to work when the software is updated, except in the rare cases where commands have been altered/removed. I would suggest updating to the latest software release (available from https://www.cmm.bristol.ac.uk/clients ...
- Wed May 15, 2024 11:55 am
- Forum: R2MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Binary outcome Multiple membership model
- Replies: 15
- Views: 194858
Re: Binary outcome Multiple membership model
Thanks for this additional information, I think that I can see what is causing the problem now. As part of the estimation process for discrete response models MLwiN creates a number of intermediate new columns. For univariate responses these are named "H", "F~(H)", "H*", "P", "MASK" and "Y-VAR ...
- Tue May 07, 2024 10:55 am
- Forum: Realcom user forum
- Topic: Please allow me further question.
- Replies: 4
- Views: 107927
Re: Please allow me further question.
Unfortunately Realcom does not have any estimation settings that would speed up for time taken for a single iteration.
- Tue May 07, 2024 10:49 am
- Forum: Stat-JR user forum
- Topic: Winbugs installation
- Replies: 3
- Views: 58727
Re: Winbugs installation
It appears that WinBUGS/OpenBUGS are once again available for download, and can be obtained from https://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/software/bugs/.
- Wed May 01, 2024 10:15 am
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: Specifying multiple chains in runmlwin
- Replies: 3
- Views: 58644
Re: Specifying multiple chains in runmlwin
It appears that the MRC website where this is normally available had some problems recently. WinBUGS/OpenBUGS are now available again from following page:
https://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/software/bugs/
https://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/software/bugs/
- Fri Apr 19, 2024 2:39 pm
- Forum: R2MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Binary outcome Multiple membership model
- Replies: 15
- Views: 194858
Re: Binary outcome Multiple membership model
Thanks for this extra information. From what you say I think that the problem was that R isn't aware that the different ID columns making up the multiple membership are in any related. When you make a factor variable R will set the underlying value to 1..N where N is the number of unique values and ...