Search found 1359 matches

by ChrisCharlton
Tue Jul 09, 2024 10:22 am
Forum: runmlwin user forum
Topic: lr-test
Replies: 1
Views: 44121

Re: lr-test

You could try a Wald test, an example of which is given in the MLwiN manual replication examples for runmlwin:

Chapter 9: Logistic Models for Binary and Binomial Responses

A more detailed explanation for these examples can be found in the corresponding chapter of the MLwiN User Guide
by ChrisCharlton
Tue Jul 09, 2024 10:13 am
Forum: runmlwin user forum
Topic: Issues Running runMLwiN on macOS with Virtual Machine
Replies: 2
Views: 46498

Re: Issues Running runMLwiN on macOS with Virtual Machine

Unfortunately I have not had much success with running the MLwiN trial under Wine on MacOS versions later than 10.14, as later versions removed support for 32-bit applications and then moved from the Intel to ARM platform. This might change in the future as Wine is developed and experimental support ...
by ChrisCharlton
Thu Jun 27, 2024 3:31 pm
Forum: runmlwin user forum
Topic: Error "Unable to invert xtx."
Replies: 4
Views: 58738

Re: Error "Unable to invert xtx."

It's hard to say what exactly is causing this error without seeing the data. It could be something like there being colinear variables in the model, or you might have categorical variables where no data is present for a particular category value.

In order to work out what might be going on I would ...
by ChrisCharlton
Tue May 21, 2024 9:37 am
Forum: MLwiN user forum
Topic: Finding multilevel model level three residuals
Replies: 2
Views: 47174

Re: Finding multilevel model level three residuals

If you're using MLwiN then you can request residuals at any level using the "Residuals" window (see chapter 3 of the MLwiN user guide: https://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/media/software/mlwin/downloads/manuals/3-07/manual-web.pdf ), or by using RLEV command in combination with the RESI command.
by ChrisCharlton
Fri May 17, 2024 3:45 pm
Forum: MLwiN user forum
Topic: Incompatibility of MLwiN Macros after upgrade
Replies: 1
Views: 44377

Re: Incompatibility of MLwiN Macros after upgrade

On the whole macros written in older versions are supposed to continue to work when the software is updated, except in the rare cases where commands have been altered/removed. I would suggest updating to the latest software release (available from https://www.cmm.bristol.ac.uk/clients ...
by ChrisCharlton
Wed May 15, 2024 11:55 am
Forum: R2MLwiN user forum
Topic: Binary outcome Multiple membership model
Replies: 15
Views: 194858

Re: Binary outcome Multiple membership model

Thanks for this additional information, I think that I can see what is causing the problem now. As part of the estimation process for discrete response models MLwiN creates a number of intermediate new columns. For univariate responses these are named "H", "F~(H)", "H*", "P", "MASK" and "Y-VAR ...
by ChrisCharlton
Tue May 07, 2024 10:55 am
Forum: Realcom user forum
Topic: Please allow me further question.
Replies: 4
Views: 107927

Re: Please allow me further question.

Unfortunately Realcom does not have any estimation settings that would speed up for time taken for a single iteration.
by ChrisCharlton
Tue May 07, 2024 10:49 am
Forum: Stat-JR user forum
Topic: Winbugs installation
Replies: 3
Views: 58727

Re: Winbugs installation

It appears that WinBUGS/OpenBUGS are once again available for download, and can be obtained from https://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/software/bugs/.
by ChrisCharlton
Wed May 01, 2024 10:15 am
Forum: runmlwin user forum
Topic: Specifying multiple chains in runmlwin
Replies: 3
Views: 58644

Re: Specifying multiple chains in runmlwin

It appears that the MRC website where this is normally available had some problems recently. WinBUGS/OpenBUGS are now available again from following page:

https://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/software/bugs/
by ChrisCharlton
Fri Apr 19, 2024 2:39 pm
Forum: R2MLwiN user forum
Topic: Binary outcome Multiple membership model
Replies: 15
Views: 194858

Re: Binary outcome Multiple membership model

Thanks for this extra information. From what you say I think that the problem was that R isn't aware that the different ID columns making up the multiple membership are in any related. When you make a factor variable R will set the underlying value to 1..N where N is the number of unique values and ...