Hi Johannes,
The VPC and ICC have the same formulae for all random intercept models (including your null model). It is only in random slopes models where the variability at higher levels depends on predictor variables that the 2 concepts diverge.
Best wishes,
Bill.
Search found 156 matches
- Mon Apr 01, 2019 6:27 am
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: Cross-classified logit model: Getting the ICCs
- Replies: 8
- Views: 13344
- Fri Mar 29, 2019 1:11 pm
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: Cross-classified logit model: Getting the ICCs
- Replies: 8
- Views: 13344
Re: Cross-classified logit model: Getting the ICCs
Hi Johannes, My suggestion is to fit your model as you are doing and then extract the different variances for each level along with pi^2/3 for the binomial variation at level 1 and sum these together to get total variance. Then the ICC for any particular classification is it's variance / total varia...
- Tue Mar 05, 2019 9:03 am
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: About multivariate response model
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3608
Re: About multivariate response model
Hi Chenr392, That all sounds quite complicated. Perhaps a starting point would be to fit separate univariate models for the type A and B responses you could then look at the estimates produced. I would then be tempted to fit a univariate model but with indicator functions to identify A and B so that...
- Fri Mar 01, 2019 3:31 pm
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Sequential modelling strategies in ML modelling
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4492
Re: Sequential modelling strategies in ML modelling
Hi John, Good question. I think probably the answer is to not worry overly about the levels when choosing your blocking though often your blocks might naturally group into levels anyway. The bigger challenge is when you move on to random slopes and deciding which variables to allow to vary at higher...
- Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:28 am
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: level 1 variance
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3795
Re: level 1 variance
Hi Megan,
As you are fitting a binary outcome the model is a Binomial model and so is there no level 1 variance i.e. for the binomial distribution the variance is a function of the mean so therefore the box disappears. Hope this makes sense.
Bill.
As you are fitting a binary outcome the model is a Binomial model and so is there no level 1 variance i.e. for the binomial distribution the variance is a function of the mean so therefore the box disappears. Hope this makes sense.
Bill.
- Tue Nov 06, 2018 10:24 am
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Related variables at different levels
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5372
Re: Related variables at different levels
Hi John, It is quite standard to construct compositional variables in a multilevel model and add them to the model as contextual effects on top of the individual effects. If you think about our example datasets we talk about gender and school gender and one would use the gender variable to construct...
- Tue Nov 06, 2018 10:21 am
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Heteroscedasticity
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5949
Re: Heteroscedasticity
Hi Rina,
Presumably you can do a likelihood ratio test between the models with and without heterogeneity and keep those predictors that make a significant difference in the random part?
Best wishes,
Bill.
Presumably you can do a likelihood ratio test between the models with and without heterogeneity and keep those predictors that make a significant difference in the random part?
Best wishes,
Bill.
- Tue Oct 16, 2018 3:47 pm
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Finite population correction
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5513
Re: Finite population correction
Hi John,
There isn't a whole lot of literature on FPCs for multilevel models and MLwiN assumes an infinite population in all it's calculations. A search will find a few recent papers if you are interested.
Best wishes,
Bill.
There isn't a whole lot of literature on FPCs for multilevel models and MLwiN assumes an infinite population in all it's calculations. A search will find a few recent papers if you are interested.
Best wishes,
Bill.
- Mon Oct 15, 2018 1:22 pm
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: Cross-classified logit model: Getting the ICCs
- Replies: 8
- Views: 13344
Re: Cross-classified logit model: Getting the ICCs
Hi Johannes, I am not sure here whether you mean ICC or VPC but I can offer the paper I wrote on variance partitioning in multilevel logistic models (Browne et al., 2005 JRSS A https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2004.00365.x ). This covers overdispersed models which are...
- Fri Oct 05, 2018 10:23 am
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: Specifying orthogonal in Hierarchical Centring decreases ESS
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5369
Re: Specifying orthogonal in Hierarchical Centring decreases ESS
Hi KazimovHH, Thanks for the email. Hard to know what the right answer here as you have 2 techniques (Orthogonal parameterisation and Hierarchical centering) which do different things and can both improve mixing for particular model features so the answer will depend on your particular dataset. Orth...