citing MLwiN 2.29
Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 2:25 pm
Hi,
I wonder how using MLwiN 2.29 for MCMC estimation with the runmlwin module for Stata should be exactly cited.
On the website of the University of Bristol (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/software/mlwin/refs.html) I find the following information on citing MLwiN:
MLwiN Version 2.1
Rasbash, J., Charlton, C., Browne, W.J., Healy, M. and Cameron, B. (2009) MLwiN Version 2.1. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.
Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) estimation
If you are using MCMC estimation methods, we ask that you additionally cite:
Browne, W.J. (2009) MCMC Estimation in MLwiN v2.1. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.[/i]
This information refers to MLwiN version 2.1. and to the MCMC guide of 2009, whereas I use the latest version of MLwiN (2.29) and the guide of Browne for MCMC estimation of 2012 (with MLwiN v2.25). Should the most recent information be cited?
Kind regards,
Sarah
I wonder how using MLwiN 2.29 for MCMC estimation with the runmlwin module for Stata should be exactly cited.
On the website of the University of Bristol (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/software/mlwin/refs.html) I find the following information on citing MLwiN:
MLwiN Version 2.1
Rasbash, J., Charlton, C., Browne, W.J., Healy, M. and Cameron, B. (2009) MLwiN Version 2.1. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.
Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) estimation
If you are using MCMC estimation methods, we ask that you additionally cite:
Browne, W.J. (2009) MCMC Estimation in MLwiN v2.1. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.[/i]
This information refers to MLwiN version 2.1. and to the MCMC guide of 2009, whereas I use the latest version of MLwiN (2.29) and the guide of Browne for MCMC estimation of 2012 (with MLwiN v2.25). Should the most recent information be cited?
Kind regards,
Sarah