Returned matrix e(b)
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2014 9:24 am
Dear all,
I have a question for clarification and maybe the answer is very obvious. I am currently trying to estimate a random-intercept multinomial model in 2 steps: an initial model following the IGLS-procedure and an MCMC-variant of the same model. To obtain the MCMC-model I draw on the initsb() option to define the starting values input for all parameters. This matrix consists of FP's (fixed parameters for both equations), RP's (random parameters) and OD's. Latter category refers to bcons_1 and bcons_2 (two constants of the multinomial equations I guess) and this estimate is typically about 1.00 but does anyone really know what 'OD' stands for and what its exact meaning is?
In the IGLS-model I obtain these two OD's (bcons_1 and bcons_2) as I only estimate the diagonal of the variance-covariance matrix, while the MCMC-model yields only 1 OD (bcons_1). However, this might be a consequence of estimating the whole variance-covariance matrix in MCMC. Because my guess is that both matrix sizes have to correspond?
Best,
Fon
I have a question for clarification and maybe the answer is very obvious. I am currently trying to estimate a random-intercept multinomial model in 2 steps: an initial model following the IGLS-procedure and an MCMC-variant of the same model. To obtain the MCMC-model I draw on the initsb() option to define the starting values input for all parameters. This matrix consists of FP's (fixed parameters for both equations), RP's (random parameters) and OD's. Latter category refers to bcons_1 and bcons_2 (two constants of the multinomial equations I guess) and this estimate is typically about 1.00 but does anyone really know what 'OD' stands for and what its exact meaning is?
In the IGLS-model I obtain these two OD's (bcons_1 and bcons_2) as I only estimate the diagonal of the variance-covariance matrix, while the MCMC-model yields only 1 OD (bcons_1). However, this might be a consequence of estimating the whole variance-covariance matrix in MCMC. Because my guess is that both matrix sizes have to correspond?
Best,
Fon